There are so few symbols as iconic and monumental as the “S” Superman symbol… maybe the McDonalds “M” and the sign of the cross are up there too. In less than a century, the S of Superman has become the sign for the superhero: The hero of modern day fantasies with phantasmal powers that can solve any problem with his or her abilities.
So after a failed reboot of the series a few years ago, and a keen observation made about the success of the Nolan Batman trilogy, DC thought it had a good idea about how to make the “perfect” Superman movie. And maybe that’s the core issue of Man of Steel. It tries to be perfect. No movie is perfect. It was as if the script and movie were built on the fact that it has to be as grand and epic as is humanly possible in a 2 and a half hour movie, instead of trying to make a genuinely good movie.
The movie starts off on Krypton, with a well-polished origin story. Russell Crowe as Jor-El, Superman’s biological father, captivates and is one of the star performances of the film. After an epic introduction we fast-forward to Earth. Clark is tagging along on different routes to the north, trying to follow up on evidence of an alien ship. This is never really explained though, and I was happy that I had read an earlier review that stated this. The lack of grounding in this early scene is done in an attempt to have Clark be mysterious, and stealthy: a true “secret” God among us.
The major problem of the film was the zero character development. I don’t think the overly-brooding character was Zak Snyder’s fault. I think DC blindindly saw the success of Nolan’s Batman series, and demanded an equally brooding Superman… not realizing the love of Superman comes from the exact opposite. Again, I don’t see Cavill’s performance at fault. It felt as if he could’ve delivered a marvelous Clark if given the chance. But remember, DC wants you to remember how “grand” this character is, so whenever Clark/Superman isn’t brooding or looking mysterious (and particularly sexy), it almost feels uncomfortable and extremely out of place, even though it shouldn’t feel like that! The choice to make him more serious was taken way too far and way too out of context. This is Superman/Clark Kent, not Batman… Even as angry as Christian Bale’s Batman got, he had an exorbitant amount of charm as Bruce Wayne.
Lois Lane… how to begin. She felt almost useless. Scenes with Lois and Perry in the beginning are a refreshing break from the overly Herculean scenes that plague the rest of the movie. She is some of the movie’s only charm, but after showing the glimpses familiar flare and spunk that we’ve come to know in Lois, her character quickly transforms into a stolid plot device.
As I’ve said, this movie tried to be monumental. There were scenes included that I think some producers sat down and thought “Oh wow, these could totally be deeply analyzed!” Like Clark being bullied and pushed to the ground, while holding a book about Plato’s philosophies… He’s 11. Or Clark speaking to a priest for advice, with a glass-pane of Jesus staring down at him. I mean… really? Completely unnecessary. When Jor-El says in the beginning of the movie, as well as in the main trailer, “He’ll be a God to them,” DC really tries to prove that! By shoving the idea down our throats! We get it!
There are shining lights of the movie. For one: the action. Long have Superman fans waited for a live-action series that had the budget to create a big bad-ass fight between Superman and a star villain like Zod. Zak Snyder, director of 300 and Watchmen, was the perfect director to pull this off. Superman faces off some of Zod’s cronies in downtown Smallville, and you can practically feel every punch being delivered. No Kryptonite islands in site!
The idea that Clark is “the answer to ‘are we alone in the universe?’” is played upon a few times. The whole mythology of Krypton is definitely intoxicating and imaginative. I found myself as curious and amazed as Clark seemed to be. Whether or not it stayed 100% true to the source material, the back-story developed for this Superman was definitely on-par and with little flaw.
If you’re a fan of film scores, you’ll appreciate the brilliant score by Hans Zimmer, the new John Williams. Zimmer’s score is really one of the true “epic” things about the movie. Listening to the score alone makes me feel hopeful and alive and meaningful in this large universe. It’s perfectly interwoven with the action of the film, and the film could not have been the same without it. If the film couldn’t capture the fact that Superman truly is a “God,” the score definitely did.
Performances by Michael Shannon and Laurence Fishburne, playing Zod and Perry White respectively are also some of the star points of the movie, whose scenes flourish and remain forever interesting.
Ultimately, DC set to make a darker Superman, to launch a Justice League series. They did. Unfortunately, in my opinion, they made him too brooding and unemotional. Cavill could’ve given more flare to the performance, but the script hardly allowed it. The disappointment of this movie lies in its potential. I can see where it could’ve been a 10/10 and it really bothers me that they don’t see it as well. DC needs to remember the hero is called “Superman,” not Godman. Man of Steel was origin origin origin, final action, final action, real final action with no in between.
The movie did, at moments, have a very distinct charm to it; something that is recognizable in past Superman scenes. I walk away from this movie, wishing that it had had 10 times as much of that charm. Hopefully now that the big battle is over, we can see more of it in a sequel that’s bound to come. Cavill and Adams can be the Clark and Lois we love if given the opportunity. I already like them DC. Let me love them!
At the end of the day, I’d say go see it. Superman is iconic as I said, and I think he deserves to be given a chance. And it’ll definitely be a chance for you. You may hate it, or you may actually be caught up in grandness of it, and it may work 110% for you. Or you could be like me and wonder about what it could’ve done better.
I give it a 5.8/10. You’ve never seen a superhero movie like this, and I don’t think you’ll ever see Superman like this again, so why not give it a shot?
—-
************SPOILER SPOILER SPOILERS*********************
*****SPOILER***** The end of the movie and final Zod/Supes scene.
I’d like to talk about one of the final scenes, so please scroll down to see my discussion.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
…so he kills Zod? Hmm…. When he cracked his neck, my jaw dropped and it stayed like that for a solid five minutes. What to think of this? I mean, it breaks Superman’s golden rule, but this Superman is very new to the world and to himself. He’s not the iconic hero of Metropolis yet; only a rookie.
On one hand, I roll my eyes and go “Yeah DC, we get it. You want to make Superman dark.” So he kills Zod…?
But on the other hand, I look at the movie, and see how it connects to the themes that they are shoving down our throats. Clark isn’t human, but he will shape the human race, like a god. He knows that you shouldn’t kill, even if that “lesson” doesn’t represent him wholly yet. The act of “killing.” He does it for us, ala “suffering emotionally for our own sins.” (When he screams out, he acknowledges how he didn’t want to reach that point, because he’s always held back from that). But now he realizes that he’ll do what we shouldn’t because he is the God among us. He will make the mistakes for us, because he believes he is invulnerable enough to withstand the blowback.
Killing Zod obviously wasn’t Clark’s ideal plan. He tried to subdue him as much as possible, but Zod is a warrior by birth as explained. There is no subduing Zod. Is Zod the exception to Clark’s golden rule? Are there allowed to be exceptions for Superman? Should we hold him to the same standards as us? As I was saying, Clark knows it’s wrong, but if someone has got to do it, then he will… because it is his people, and Zod’s people decimated half of Metropolis because of Clark.
What about you? How far could your rule stretch? Is the end of the planet acceptable enough to break the rule? Even though thousands had probably already died in Metropolis, what was it about the family of four that Clark couldn’t bear to witness? Maybe it was just that: the witnessing. He must realize that people have been killed already, but after kissing Lois he thought the battle was over. Killing Zod was the surefire way to end Zod’s tyrannical ambitions. Zod admitted that he was programmed at birth, so was Clark really killing a “Kryptonian?” One that had roamed the stars before? Or was Clark destroying the result of the failure of the long-dead Kryptonian race and just getting rid of a machine?
All things to keep in mind. I wanted to vent this all myself, because the killing has got me thinking a lot. While at first, I thought it was just done to make him darker, but after acknowledges what they were teaching us the entire movie, I felt it had to be more than that.






















